Thinking of One’s Own Death to Gain Perspective

by Donna Maurer

If I were to say out loud that I try to think of death every day, many people might react by worrying about my state of mental health and wellbeing. More and more, people are saying that they “want to live each day as if it were their last.” But that is not exactly the same thing as thinking of death, even though living life in such a way may result from such thoughts. 

I remember an incident that happened a few years ago: A friend and I were walking in the Vedanta Society of Providence parking lot when a car pulled in abruptly with us in its path, leading us both to instinctively jump out of the way. We also had the same verbal reaction: “Not Yet!”

Many times it is the “wake-up calls” that propel us into action: Someone close to us passes away, we have a brush with death or a serious disease, or we watch
scenes of an unexpected tragedy on the news. Oftentimes, people have very strong emotional reactions to such incidents, at least in part I think, because they fear for their own mortality.

Swami Vivekananda, I feel, would admonish us all to abandon fear, to gather up and direct the emotions, and to focus on the goal of one’s life. Depending on one’s perspective, the “goal of life” may be what occurs prior to death, during death, or after death. Thus for some, the goal may be a “fulfilling life,” for others it may be God-Realization, while for others it may be reaching heaven, as they perceive it.

Just acknowledging the inevitability of one’s own death puts all actions into their appropriate context in relation to achieving the goal; in other words, it leads to a number of questions for personal reflection: What is important? What’s not important? On what should my attention be focused? What is the best use of time? Is there something I am avoiding? Is there something I truly want to do in this life that I might seriously regret if I don’t do it? Am I stuck or lazy and need to make some extra efforts to move forward?

Thinking about death doesn’t mean dwelling on death, nor does it mean having a morbid disposition in life. While it’s great to live in the present moment, having a perspective on what’s important in the present moment is what can help us make this human life meaningful and move forward toward the goal.
www.vedantaprov.org

Become Like Children

by Gloria Maité

In today’s reading of the Gospel at the Catholic Church, Jesus urges each of us to be like children:

“The disciples approached Jesus and said,
‘Who is the greatest in the Kingdom of heaven?’
He called a child over, placed him in their midst, and said,
‘Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children,
you will not enter the Kingdom of heaven.
Whoever becomes humble like this child
is the greatest in the Kingdom of heaven.
And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me.

See that you do not despise one of these little ones,
for I say to you that their angels in heaven
always look upon the face of my heavenly Father.
What is your opinion?
If a man has a hundred sheep and one of them goes astray,
will he not leave the ninety-nine in the hills
and go in search of the stray?


And if he finds it, amen, I say to you, he rejoices more over it
than over the ninety-nine that did not stray.
In just the same way, it is not the will of your heavenly Father
that one of these little ones be lost’.”     

              (Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 18:1-5.10.12-14)

This week at the Vedanta Society we have many of these little ones attending the Children Camp. They create so much uncertainty! Their little hands reaching hidden places, their feet running faster than their minds, their shining eyes and smiles breaking through all routines, rhythms, and ideas of organization that the life at the center usually holds. What to do with so much vulnerability and fearlessness? “Become like children,” says Jesus, and I wonder if I have grown up too much to fit through the door of the Kingdom of heaven.

www.vedantaprov.org

Multiverse – Parallel Universes

By  Kaivalyam
Scientists try to discover life beyond earth by restricting themselves to search for only those conditions that support life as perceived by our human mind. In religion also, we hear about the possibilities of numerous worlds, but this is not restricted to only one idea of a perceived notion of life.

Realm of Transcendence

Have you ever wondered how an ant would visualize your pouring water on it or your destroying its anthill? Of course, as a human being it is difficult to comprehend its perception of such intrusions. Very likely, all that an ant perceives is only a disturbance that potentially endangers its life and it just tries to avoid it. It would not be able to comprehend your entire towering figure and your particular action. So pouring of water or destroying its anthill for an ant could simply be an equivalent of a rainfall or an earthquake for a human being.

The greater the disparities in the states of mind between two creatures, the greater will be the tendency to perceive an action by another living entity as a disturbance. A hierarchy in the states of mind can be proposed: the unicellular organisms at one end and the humans at the other extreme with other creatures in between. We can extrapolate this hierarchy beyond the human mind: What we see as an earthquake or hurricane could actually be an intrusion from another creature at a higher state of mind whom we cannot perceive, just as an ant cannot perceive us in our actions. This could likely be the reason in Hinduism, the natural forces like wind etc. have been given some anthropomorphic qualities. Ultimately, by this extension we reach a single God-head who is superior to everything and controls all.


Realm of Immanence

The simplest known independently living entity is a cell (or its organelles). A collection of these cells is called a tissue. An organ consists of a bunch of such tissues and a collection of organs makes up the organism. Each cell independently can live like an organism itself given the right environment. Hence, just as an organism has a sense of being an independent agency, within it, there are numerous “beings” like cells, tissues etc. that have their own sense of being an independent entity. As in the transcendental hierarchical realm, an entity can perceive the entities below it in their entirety, but not of those further up. Extrapolating this realm further, all creatures could be perceived as a small part of a bigger cosmic entity. Extending this ad infinitum, we reach a single all-pervading entity beyond which no other entity exists. This entity is referred to in Purusha Suktam as the “Being with thousand heads, thousand eyes etc.” as every other separate entity is part of that Being who pervades all.


Both these transcendental and immanent realms together show the existence of parallel universes. Religion has beautifully put forward the concept of life in a multiverse at a much more generic level than what science restricts itself to.

www.vedantaprov.org

Most Beautiful Names

By BeJoy

“There is no deity except Allah. To Him belong the most beautiful names” (Qur’an 20:8). Among the various verses of the holy Qur’an, there are mentioned no less than 99 names (or attributes) of God. Talking about the virtues of these names, Prophet Mohammed affirmed that “whoever believes in their meanings and acts accordingly, will enter Paradise” (Hadith – Sahih Bukhari 8:419).

In this holy month of Ramadan, when hundreds of millions are practicing purity and austerities, let us appreciate these beautiful names of God and meditate on them:

1.  The All-Compassionate     (Ar-Rahman)
2.  The All-Merciful          (Ar-Rahim)
3.  The Absolute Ruler        (Al-Malik)
4.  The Pure One              (Al-Quddus)
5.  The Source of Peace       (As-Salam)
6.  The Inspirer of Faith     (Al-Mu’min)
7.  The Guardian              (Al-Muhaymin)
8.  The Victorious            (Al-Aziz)
9.  The Compeller             (Al-Jabbar)
10. The Greatest              (Al-Mutakabbir)
11. The Creator               (Al-Khaliq)
12. The Maker of Order        (Al-Bari’)
13. The Shaper of Beauty      (Al-Musawwir)
14. The Forgiving             (Al-Ghaffar)
15. The Subduer               (Al-Qahhar)
16. The Giver of All          (Al-Wahhab)
17. The Sustainer             (Ar-Razzaq)
18. The Opener                (Al-Fattah)
19. The Knower of All         (Al-`Alim)
20. The Constrictor           (Al-Qabid)
21. The Reliever              (Al-Basit)
22. The Abaser                (Al-Khafid)
23. The Exalter               (Ar-Rafi)
24. The Bestower of Honors    (Al-Mu’izz)
25. The Humiliator            (Al-Mudhill)
26. The Hearer of All         (As-Sami)

 27. The Seer of All           (Al-Basir)28. The Judge                 (Al-Hakam)
29. The Just                  (Al-Adl)
30. The Subtle One            (Al-Latif)
31. The All-Aware             (Al-Khabir)
32. The Forbearing            (Al-Halim)
33. The Magnificent           (Al-Azim)
34. The Forgiver and Hider of Faults (Al-Ghafur)
35. The Rewarder of Thankfulness (Ash-Shakur)
36. The Highest               (Al-Ali)
37. The Greatest              (Al-Kabir)
38. The Preserver             (Al-Hafiz)
39. The Nourisher             (Al-Muqit)
40. The Accounter             (Al-Hasib)
41. The Mighty                (Al-Jalil)
42. The Generous              (Al-Karim)
43. The Watchful One          (Ar-Raqib)
44. The Responder to Prayer   (Al-Mujib)
45. The All-Comprehending     (Al-Wasi)
46. The Perfectly Wise        (Al-Hakim)
47. The Loving One            (Al-Wadud)
48. The Majestic One          (Al-Majid)
49. The Resurrector           (Al-Ba’ith)
50. The Witness               (Ash-Shahid)
51. The Truth                 (Al-Haqq)
52. The Trustee               (Al-Wakil)
53. The Possessor of All Strength (Al-Qawiyy)
54. The Forceful One          (Al-Matin)
55. The Governor              (Al-Waliyy)
56. The Praised One           (Al-Hamid)
57. The Appraiser             (Al-Muhsi)
58. The Originator            (Al-Mubdi’)
59. The Restorer              (Al-Mu’id)
60. The Giver of Life         (Al-Muhyi)
61. The Taker of Life         (Al-Mumit)
62. The Ever Living One       (Al-Hayy)
63. The Self-Existing One     (Al-Qayyum)
64. The Finder                (Al-Wajid)
65. The Glorious              (Al-Majid)
66. The One, The Unique, Manifestation of Unity (Al-Wahid)
67. The One, the All Inclusive, The Indivisible (Al-Ahad)
68. The Satisfier of All Needs (As-Samad)
69. The All Powerful          (Al-Qadir)
70. The Creator of All Power  (Al-Muqtadir)
71. The Expediter             (Al-Muqaddim)
72. The Delayer               (Al-Mu’akhkhir)
73. The First                 (Al-Awwal)
74. The Last                  (Al-Akhir)
75. The Manifest One          (Az-Zahir)
76. The Hidden One            (Al-Batin)
77. The Protecting Friend     (Al-Wali)
78. The Supreme One           (Al-Muta’ali)
79. The Doer of Good          (Al-Barr)
80. The Guide to Repentance   (At-Tawwab)
81. The Avenger               (Al-Muntaqim)
82. The Forgiver              (Al-‘Afuww)
83. The Clement               (Ar-Ra’uf)
84. The Owner of All          (Malik-Al-Mulk)
85. The Lord of Majesty and Bounty (Dhu-Al-Jalal wa-Al-Ikram)
86. The Equitable One         (Al-Muqsit)
87. The Gatherer              (Al-Jami’)
88. The Rich One              (Al-Ghani)
89. The Enricher              (Al-Mughni)
90. The Preventer of Harm     (Al-Mani’)
91. The Creator of The Harmful (Ad-Darr)
92. The Creator of Good       (An-Nafi’)
93. The Light                 (An-Nur)
94. The Guide                 (Al-Hadi)
95. The Originator            (Al-Badi)
96. The Everlasting One       (Al-Baqi)
97. The Inheritor of All      (Al-Warith)
98. The Righteous Teacher     (Ar-Rashid)
99. The Patient One           (As-Sabur)

www.vedantaprov.org

Intrafaith Meeting

by Seeker
That title may sound a bit strange, and, you bet, it was a typographical error for an interfaith meeting. Usually the word “faith” in “interfaith” is associated with a major religion, and not with a particular sect of a religion. Hence in an interfaith meeting you will see representatives of Islam, Christianity, Buddhism etc., rather than a representative of Shia, Presbytarian, Theravada etc. So in the context of usage of the word “faith” in “interfaith,” an intrafaith meeting would comprise representatives of sects within a religion: say, a meeting of Buddhists from Mahayana, Tibetan, Theravada etc. traditions.
You rarely hear about any such intrafaith meetings being held. In some religions, the differences between sects had led in the past and continues to lead even now to bloodshed. In some other religions, although there may not be a violent interaction between the sects, there is enough disharmony that the sects rarely see each other eye-to-eye. So why is it easier to profess brotherly feelings for followers of other religions but not with those from one’s own?

I can think of two reasons. Let us look at them, considering Hinduism as an example, noting that the same holds for any other religion too.

1. The underlying fundamentals of all the sects in Hinduism are the same (Vedas) with differences only in practices or interpretation of scriptures, while catering to the same mass of people (largely of Indian origin). Since the same foundation (Vedas) is being interpreted by each sect differently, there is, in some counterintuitive way as a conflict of interest, more of a sense of disunity amongst the sects than they would have if they were having an entirely different fundamental basis. Also, each sect clamors for greater acceptance amongst the masses to have more followers, and this “cut-throat” competition completely contravenes the idea of brotherhood amongst the sects. However, these very sects in Hinduism will easily accept a sect of any other religion, say Christianity, that originated in an alien land, as there are clear demarcating fundamental differences (Vedas and Bible), and also they are prevalent amongst a different geographical/cultural populace.

 2. Many people within a religious sect sincerely believe that their own path is the best – if one is ruthlessly sincere, this opinion will be found within oneself. Some people openly admit this view and profess the same to others, whereas others, due to propriety, may withhold it within oneself. So striking a conciliatory note with other sects would be seen as an act of acknowledging other paths as equally valid if not as good as one’s own. This attitude of superiority of one’s own path is also carried to interfaith meetings, where one begins to feel that one’s own religion is superior to others (since now there are no sects to contend with). When it is said that one’s own ideal is the best, it is meant as “the best for oneself,” but not “the best of all ideals.” The mental make-up of a person resonates with one particular path (sect), and hence it is best suited for that person whereas it could be not so helpful to some other person.

In the old days, the divisions in Hinduism were based on whether one was a follower of Vishnu, Shiva, Durga, etc. (considering only the aspect of Personal God in Hinduism). Many of us may ridicule the prevalent sectarian divisions of those times, forgetting that we ourselves are afflicted with a similar disease nowadays based on whether one is a follower of Ramana Maharshi, Sai Baba, Ramakrishna, Chinmayananda, Sankaracharya etc. Very often the followers of these teachers disagree with the methods prescribed by other teachers, and rarely do they meet with each other to resolve or to understand such differences. Amazingly, the universalism of Hinduism that professes “the whole world is a family” (vasudhaiva kutumbakam) is usually forgotten by these very sects of Hinduism when amongst each other, but the same is emphatically proclaimed in interfaith meetings when amongst different religions.

We should ask ourselves sincerely, “Have I really made efforts to reach out to sects within my own religion with whom it is more difficult to reconcile? Do I, deep in my heart, feel that my ideal is superior to others, and if so, what efforts am I doing to negate this false sense of superiority?” I think a person will do much better with a little more introspection on this front, along with indulging in an intrafaith dialogue before merely attending an interfaith meeting and turning it into a pompous show. Jesus Christ said, “Leave your offering there before the altar and go, first be reconciled with your brother, and then come, bring your offering” (Matthew 5:24). By “brother,” He meant not only the neighbor (interfaith) but also the one within one’s family (intrafaith).
www.vedantaprov.org